Historicist Blog

An alternative view of Biblical Prophecy

What Tribulation???

There is no seven year tribulation, rapture, or single political Antichrist, in the Scriptures. Would the Dispensationalist please explain where these fictions come from, because they are incontrovertibly absent from the text?  They claim that they are in Daniel 9 and Rev 11:3; 12:6, none of these passages make any mention of a tribulation.There is no seven year tribulation, rapture, or single political Antichrist, in the Scriptures. Would the Dispensationalist please explain where these fictions come from, because they are incontrovertibly absent from the text?  They claim that they are in Daniel 9 and Rev 11:3; 12:6, none of these passages make any mention of a tribulation.

The Tribulation

Nowhere in the Bible is there a seven year tribulation.  There is a ten day tribulation in Rev. 2:10 but no seven years.  So where does this fiction come from?Nowhere in the Bible is there a seven year tribulation.  There is a ten day tribulation in Rev. 2:10 but no seven years.  So where does this fiction come from?

There are many variations within this viewpoint. Interestingly enough, this theory originated with the Jesuit Priest, Ribera who lived near the end of the 16th century. Originally it spoke of a 3 1/2-year tribulation, but by the time it had infiltrated the Protestant church, it had grown to 7 years. Integration into the Protestant doctrine, in the 1830’s, was made following ecstatic visions claimed by Margret MacDonald. This doctrine then became the litmus test for the Darbyites (Plymouth Brethren), one literally cannot be a Plymouth Brethren and not believe in the Futurist view.There are many variations within this viewpoint. Interestingly enough, this theory originated with the Jesuit Priest, Ribera who lived near the end of the 16th century. Originally it spoke of a 3 1/2-year tribulation, but by the time it had infiltrated the Protestant church, it had grown to 7 years. Integration into the Protestant doctrine, in the 1830’s, was made following ecstatic visions claimed by Margret MacDonald. This doctrine then became the litmus test for the Darbyites (Plymouth Brethren), one literally cannot be a Plymouth Brethren and not believe in the Futurist view.

It is commonly found in the teachings of John Nelson Darby (the founder of the Plymouth Brethren), Edward Irving (the founder of the Catholic Apostolic Church; who was deposed from the ministry of the Church of Scotland in March of 1833 by the Presbytery of Annan on the original charge of heresy), and Edward Bouverie Pusey (Anglican Church). Cyrus I. Scofield later put the teachings of Darby into the notes of his Scofield Reference Bible which was first published in 1909 and is still being used today.It is commonly found in the teachings of John Nelson Darby (the founder of the Plymouth Brethren), Edward Irving (the founder of the Catholic Apostolic Church; who was deposed from the ministry of the Church of Scotland in March of 1833 by the Presbytery of Annan on the original charge of heresy), and Edward Bouverie Pusey (Anglican Church). Cyrus I. Scofield later put the teachings of Darby into the notes of his Scofield Reference Bible which was first published in 1909 and is still being used today.

Christians of that time period were ripe for this con artist.  People love to feel, to be emotional and nothing can get our blood pumping better than a good, scary story.  But Christians aren’t suppose to listen to scary stories; we aren’t suppose to read about Frankenstein, vampires, The War of :   Scolfield: The Pope of Prophecy Perversion  ….  Christians of that time period were ripe for this con artist.  People love to feel, to be emotional and nothing can get our blood pumping better than a good, scary story.  But Christians aren’t suppose to listen to scary stories; we aren’t suppose to read about Frankenstein, vampires, The War of the World [broadcast by Orson Welles 1938], or Harry Potter.  The only scary stories we are allowed are of the Biblical nature.   So here you had a man who put together an acceptable scary story about the end of the world as we know it and all he had to do was call it prophetic interpretation.   His story became the most commonly held interpretation AND most feared story in Christian circles even to this day!the World [broadcast by Orson Welles 1938], or Harry Potter.  The only scary stories we are allowed are of the Biblical nature.   So here you had a man who put together an acceptable scary story about the end of the world as we know it and all he had to do was call it prophetic interpretation.   His story became the most commonly held interpretation AND most feared story in Christian circles even to this day!

However the oldest rule of hermeneutics is Quod non est Biblicum, non est Theologicum! In other words; if it ain’t in the Bible it ain’t Theology.  [please note:  While the addition of notes to the Bible can be helpful in understanding; they are just notes and do not become the equivalent of scripture]   And a seven year Tribulation just ain’t in the Bible.  Dispensationalist claim that this Tribulation is in Daniel 9. So let’s look at this passage.  This is a times prophecy and there are six things that are listed that will be fulfilled within the time frame of the prophecy.

“Seventy sevens are decreed, concerning your people and your holy city, “Seventy sevens are decreed, concerning your people and your holy city, to finish the transgression, to put an end of sin, and to atone for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal both vision and prophet, and to anoint a most Holy Place, to finish the transgression, to put an end of sin, and to atone for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal both vision and prophet, and to anoint a most Holy Place, [ or One].]. Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the word to restore and to build Jerusalem to the coming of an anointed one, Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the word to restore and to build Jerusalem to the coming of an anointed one, [the Messiah] [the Messiah] a prince, there shall be seven weeks. Then for sixty-two weeks it shall be built again with squares and water cistern, but in a troubled time. And after the sixty-two weeks an anointed one a prince, there shall be seven weeks. Then for sixty-two weeks it shall be built again with squares and water cistern, but in a troubled time. And after the sixty-two weeks an anointed one [the Messiah][the Messiah] shall be cut off, and shall have nothing and the people of a prince who is to come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary. Its end shall come with a flood, and to the end there shall be war; desolation’s are decreed. And he shall make a strong covenant with many for one week; and for half of the week he shall cause sacrifice and offering to cease; and upon the wing of abominations shall come one who makes desolate, until the decreed end is poured out on the desolator.” shall be cut off, and shall have nothing and the people of a prince who is to come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary. Its end shall come with a flood, and to the end there shall be war; desolation’s are decreed. And he shall make a strong covenant with many for one week; and for half of the week he shall cause sacrifice and offering to cease; and upon the wing of abominations shall come one who makes desolate, until the decreed end is poured out on the desolator.” Daniel 9:24-27 personal translation Daniel 9:24-27 personal translation

Interpretation:

Seventy sevens or 49 years to restore the Temple [Dan 9:25, Neh. 6:15,16]Seventy sevens or 49 years to restore the Temple [Dan 9:25, Neh. 6:15,16]

62 weeks from the decree until the anointing of the Messiah [Mat 3:16,17] for a period totaling 434 years.62 weeks from the decree until the anointing of the Messiah [Mat 3:16,17] for a period totaling 434 years.

Plus one more week or 7 years beginning with the Messiah’s ministry, during which He is cut off, and ending when the gospel is sent to the gentiles.Plus one more week or 7 years beginning with the Messiah’s ministry, during which He is cut off, and ending when the gospel is sent to the gentiles.

After the first unit of seven (49 years) would follow another 62 units (434 years) and thus, the fulfillment of the anointing of the Messiah to come after the 69 units and during the 70th unit for a total of 490 years. [Mat 3:16-17]After the first unit of seven (49 years) would follow another 62 units (434 years) and thus, the fulfillment of the anointing of the Messiah to come after the 69 units and during the 70th unit for a total of 490 years. [Mat 3:16-17]

Starting Point for counting these years:

God has given us the starting point, a decree or word “to restore and build Jerusalem” to start the counting of the Seventy Sevens. There were six such decrees to rebuild Jerusalem!  There is also the problem of calendars.  The Jews to this day use a lunar calendar and the Babylonians like us used a solar one.  Taking these different calendars and the six separate decrees into consideration the culmination of this prophecy is simply the life and times of Jesus the Messiah. This time line has had the missing years of the Gregorian Calendar push forward and out of the way, making the crucifixion to date 29 AD.God has given us the starting point, a decree or word “to restore and build Jerusalem” to start the counting of the Seventy Sevens. There were six such decrees to rebuild Jerusalem!  There is also the problem of calendars.  The Jews to this day use a lunar calendar and the Babylonians like us used a solar one.  Taking these different calendars and the six separate decrees into consideration the culmination of this prophecy is simply the life and times of Jesus the Messiah. This time line has had the missing years of the Gregorian Calendar push forward and out of the way, making the crucifixion to date 29 AD.

480 BC Xerxes                              +490 lunar years                   = 6 BC the nativity. 457 BC480 BC Xerxes                              +490 lunar years                   = 6 BC the nativity. 457 BC

Ezra’s 1st  return *                  +490 solar years                  = 34 AD Gospel to GentilesEzra’s 1st  return *                  +490 solar years                  = 34 AD Gospel to Gentiles

444 BC Nehemiah’s 1st return      +490 lunar years            = 33 AD Gospel to Gentiles444 BC Nehemiah’s 1st return      +490 lunar years            = 33 AD Gospel to Gentiles

425 BC Artaxerxes                  +490 solar years                = 66 AD Jewish wars425 BC Artaxerxes                  +490 solar years                = 66 AD Jewish wars

408 BC Ezra’s 2nd return               +490 lunar years              = 68 AD siege of Jerusalem408 BC Ezra’s 2nd return               +490 lunar years              = 68 AD siege of Jerusalem

395 BC Nehemiah’s 2nd return      +490 solar years     = 96 AD John  writes The Revelation395 BC Nehemiah’s 2nd return      +490 solar years     = 96 AD John  writes The Revelation

So where is the left over time for a Tribulation?   This Daniel passage is all fulfilled.   Messiah came was cut off and the temple destroyed.  Prophecy Fulfilled!  Nothing is left undone, and the time is up.So where is the left over time for a Tribulation?   This Daniel passage is all fulfilled.   Messiah came was cut off and the temple destroyed.  Prophecy Fulfilled!  Nothing is left undone, and the time is up.

In the person of Christ Jesus, all Old Testament prophecy concerning the Messiah is fulfilled. [John 5:39] From Adam’s first sin to the last sin of mankind, our eternal redemption is promised and purchased for us by His blood, in this one solitary event. There is an element of timeless eternal sovereignty, for before the foundation of the world the Lamb was slain [Rev 13:8]; and yet, we who are His own possession are awaiting our full redemption. [Heb 9:11-12] Then we will be as He is, when mortality takes on immortality. [I Cor 15:52-53] The law, that foreshadowed His Atoning Sacrifice, is fulfilled through Christ and His work on the cross and in the resurrection.[Acts 3:18]  He is the final and ultimate atonement for sin. [Heb 11:25-26]In the person of Christ Jesus, all Old Testament prophecy concerning the Messiah is fulfilled. [John 5:39] From Adam’s first sin to the last sin of mankind, our eternal redemption is promised and purchased for us by His blood, in this one solitary event. There is an element of timeless eternal sovereignty, for before the foundation of the world the Lamb was slain [Rev 13:8]; and yet, we who are His own possession are awaiting our full redemption. [Heb 9:11-12] Then we will be as He is, when mortality takes on immortality. [I Cor 15:52-53] The law, that foreshadowed His Atoning Sacrifice, is fulfilled through Christ and His work on the cross and in the resurrection.[Acts 3:18]  He is the final and ultimate atonement for sin. [Heb 11:25-26]

These last seven years of the Seventy weeks fulfilled Gods promise of a Messiah the Redeemer. The Crucifixion of Christ in 29 AD, was 3 1/2 years after his anointing in 26 AD and 3 1/2 years before the apostles began preaching to the Gentiles. For 3 1/2 years, the Messiah walked among the Jews, preaching to them, healing them, touching them but in the end, they rejected him, and he was cut off.  After his death, resurrection and ascension His disciples continued His ministry among the Jews but they also were rejected, persecuted, and even killed. With His promise fulfilled to Jews, God now sent out His gospel and Spirit to the Gentiles, breaking off some of the natural branches while grafting in the wild branches.  [Rom 11:17-24] Now both will share in the richness of God’s mercy and grace.These last seven years of the Seventy weeks fulfilled Gods promise of a Messiah the Redeemer. The Crucifixion of Christ in 29 AD, was 3 1/2 years after his anointing in 26 AD and 3 1/2 years before the apostles began preaching to the Gentiles. For 3 1/2 years, the Messiah walked among the Jews, preaching to them, healing them, touching them but in the end, they rejected him, and he was cut off.  After his death, resurrection and ascension His disciples continued His ministry among the Jews but they also were rejected, persecuted, and even killed. With His promise fulfilled to Jews, God now sent out His gospel and Spirit to the Gentiles, breaking off some of the natural branches while grafting in the wild branches.  [Rom 11:17-24] Now both will share in the richness of God’s mercy and grace.

The anointing of the Holy One was to bring about six promises of God, reconciling us to Him, and making us free indeed, through His Son.The anointing of the Holy One was to bring about six promises of God, reconciling us to Him, and making us free indeed, through His Son.

To finish the transgression [Is 53:5; Heb 9:15]To finish the transgression [Is 53:5; Heb 9:15]

Put an end to sin [Mat 1:21; Jn 1:29; Heb 9:26, 10:4-7]Put an end to sin [Mat 1:21; Jn 1:29; Heb 9:26, 10:4-7]

Atone for iniquity [Is 53:6; II Cor 5:18; Col 1:20-22]Atone for iniquity [Is 53:6; II Cor 5:18; Col 1:20-22]

Bring in everlasting righteousness [Heb 9:12; Rom 5:17-21 ; II Cor 5:21]Bring in everlasting righteousness [Heb 9:12; Rom 5:17-21 ; II Cor 5:21]

Seal both vision and prophet [Mat 11:13-14; Acts 3:18]Seal both vision and prophet [Mat 11:13-14; Acts 3:18]

Anoint a most holy one or place [Lk 1:35, 4:18-22; Jn 1:32-34]Anoint a most holy one or place [Lk 1:35, 4:18-22; Jn 1:32-34]

The gospel was to go to the Jews first, then the Gentiles. This coincides with Peter’s vision of preaching the gospel to Cornelius (a gentile) and the stoning of Stephen, the first Christian martyr. [Mk 16:15; 16:20; Acts 3:25,26; 8:4, 10; 11:19; 13:46; Rom 1:16] The general time of these events easily fits within the last three and one half years of the Seventieth week. There is no time left over or a gap in-between!The gospel was to go to the Jews first, then the Gentiles. This coincides with Peter’s vision of preaching the gospel to Cornelius (a gentile) and the stoning of Stephen, the first Christian martyr. [Mk 16:15; 16:20; Acts 3:25,26; 8:4, 10; 11:19; 13:46; Rom 1:16] The general time of these events easily fits within the last three and one half years of the Seventieth week. There is no time left over or a gap in-between!

1260 Days:

The Dispensationalist say there are two periods of 1260 days, and that adds up to seven years.  OK, even if they are right about the time; where is the Tribulation?The Dispensationalist say there are two periods of 1260 days, and that adds up to seven years.  OK, even if they are right about the time; where is the Tribulation?

Rev. 11:3 “Rev. 11:3 “and I will grant my two witnesses power to prophesy for one thousand two hundred and sixty days, clothed in sackcloth.”and I will grant my two witnesses power to prophesy for one thousand two hundred and sixty days, clothed in sackcloth.”

Rev. 12:6 “Rev. 12:6 “and the woman fled into the wilderness, where she has a place prepared by God, in which to be nourished for one thousand two hundred and sixty days.”and the woman fled into the wilderness, where she has a place prepared by God, in which to be nourished for one thousand two hundred and sixty days.”

Here are the 2 references to 1260 days.  We see two preachers preaching and a woman being nourished; but still no tribulation.  Again we ask … Where is the Seven Year Tribulation found in the Holy Scriptures?

Advertisement

8 Responses to What Tribulation???

  1. Karl March 14, 2010 at 6:41 am

    [Noted your reference to Irving and decided to share this recently seen web item.]

    EDWARD IRVING IS UNNERVING !

    by Dave MacPherson

    All of my books since 1973 have stated that Rev. Edward Irving and his followers (Irvingites) – as well as Margaret Macdonald – taught a pretribulation rapture before John Darby did.
    Margaret’s 117-line pretrib “revelation” account (which, by the way, contains 59 Bible verses or parts of verses – about one in every other line) was admittedly not as detailed as the many articles in “The Morning Watch” (Irvingite journal) which from 1829 to 1833 clearly and extensively portrayed a pretrib rapture. Naturally my Darby-exalting critics gang up on Margaret so that they won’t have to face up to overwhelming evidence that the Irvingites did in fact precede Darby!
    (While I’m at it – I wish now that I had never used terms like Margaret’s “revelation” or “vision” even though others have. I should have referred only to her “view” or “Scriptural interpretation.” If I had done so, my opponents wouldn’t have had an excuse to associate “occult” or “witch” or “demon” with her totally Biblical discussion while playing the current rapture debate “game of gossip”!)
    Scofield and Ironside are among the Darby defenders who have boldly concluded, minus evidence, that pretrib rapturism never existed in Irvingite circles.
    Even Ernest Sandeen’s “The Roots of Fundamentalism” (p. 64f) asserted that Irving and his followers didn’t teach anything resembling a Darbyesque secret, pretrib rapture. (His conclusion was based on only two unrelated (!) prophetic utterances which were spoken many months after pretrib was first clearly taught in Irving’s journal in Sep. 1830!) J. Barton Payne responded to Sandeen by writing that “MacPherson has once and for all overthrown Ernest Sandeen’s assertions that the Irvingites never ‘advocated any doctrine resembling the secret rapture’ and that to connect J. N. Darby and early dispensationalism with Irving’s church is ‘a groundless and pernicious charge’….For serious students of the history of dispensationalism the study of MacPherson’s discoveries has become a must.” (Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, Winter, 1974)
    R. A. Huebner, a militant member of the Darbyist Plymouth Brethren, added his own name to the Irvingism-bashing list and even talked Walvoord, Ryrie, LaHaye and some other pretrib leaders into joining it. In his 1973 book Huebner actually stated: “The Irvingites (1828-1834) never held the pretribulation rapture or any ‘any-moment’ views.” His 1991 book repeated this by declaring that “the Irvingite system was a complex” that can be found “in posttribulational writers.”
    But the champion Irvingism-basher, who isn’t bashful, is Thomas Ice whose Darby-shielding darts are multiplied and repeated on the internet, world without end. He makes sure that readers of his “When Did J. N. Darby Discover the Rapture?” piece will discover his repetition that “Irving never held to pretribulationism.” In his “Myths of the Origin of Pretribulationism – Part II” he states that “One of Dave McPherson’s strangest claims is that Edward Irving and the Irvingites taught a pre-trib rapture.” And he even speaks disparagingly of “two British theologians” (Mark Patterson and Andrew Walker) who have written that “it is incontrovertible that Irving held to a pretribulation doctrine in a form that is developed and remarkably similar to contemporary dispensational views.” (!)
    My book “The Rapture Plot” (available online) includes many quotes from Irvingites proving that they taught a pretrib rapture as well as pretribulationally-correct imminence. Here are just a few examples from several issues of “The Morning Watch”:
    “Philadelphia” is described as worthy Christians who will be raptured before “the great tribulation” (TMW, Sep. 1830, p. 510)
    “…the great tribulation from which those dead in Christ, and those who shall then be alive and looking for him, shall be exempted, by being caught up to meet the Lord in the air….” (TMW, June 1831, p. 284)
    Walvoord’s, LaHaye’s, and Ice’s “any-momentness” is clearly seen in this Irvingite journal which stated: “…we miss the true object of faith and hope in the coming of the Lord, not only when we overleap it altogether, but when we interpose any screen whatever; when we look for any event of persecution or tribulation, for any combination of kings, any gathering of people, any manifestation of Antichrist.” (TMW, Dec. 1831, p. 253)
    One writer spoke of “the translation for the living…of which we may daily expect the accomplishment….” He added: “During this most horrible time of the reign of the last Antichrist, the risen and translated saints shall be with Christ….” (TMW, Mar. 1832, pp. 12-14)
    John Tudor, TMW editor, said that “some of these elect ones shall…be left in the great tribulation…after the translation of the saints….” He added that there is “nothing further to expect before the actual coming….” (TMW, Sep. 1832, pp. 11-12)
    “the literal time of 1260 days…does not commence till the moment of the translation of the saints….” (TMW, Sep. 1832, p. 48)
    It should be pointed out that during pretrib dispensationalism’s earliest development, there were those who quickly changed from the prevailing posttrib historicism to pretrib futurism, some who changed later on, and some who never changed. Naturally Darby-guardsmen such as Huebner and Ice have selectively focused on historicist Irvingites and purposely covered up pretrib futurists among the same British group to make it appear to their trusting readers that the Irvingites were totally pretrib-deficient!
    My first paper on Biblical prophecy was written in 1968. If I could have known beforehand that Darby protectors would either ignore, smear, or pseudo-scholarly skip over Margaret’s main point (a rapture before Antichrist’s revealing) and deviously quote lines only before and after it (what Ice does repeatedly), I would have focused on the incredible quality and quantity of the output of the innovative Irvingites – and brought in Margaret only as the one they claimed as their inspiration.
    Even William Kelly, Darby’s editor, knew that for 60 years evangelicalism had credited Irvingism, and not Darbyism, with pretribism. Which is why Kelly (while noting “the early prophesyings and tongues in Scotland” but adding that “we may pass these over”) focused on Irvingite writings, and not Margaret’s, in a lengthy series (1889-1890) in his own journal. Readers of “The Rapture Plot” know that Kelly, in Ice-like fashion, made so many dishonest changes while analyzing Irvingism in a supposedly fair and balanced way that evangelicalism, unable to examine hard-to-locate Irvingite writings, eventually accepted Kelly’s revisionism, the goal of which was to project Darby as the pretrib rapture originator as well as the “father of dispensationalism” – and we know how well Kelly was successful!
    I have focused on pretrib rapture beginnings for 40 years and have offered $1000 if anyone can show where I have ever dishonestly concealed or changed anything in any important rapture-related document. Unlike my opponents, my book royalties have always gone not to any individual but to a nonprofit corporation which has never paid any salary to anyone. While you’re wondering if you should obtain my 300-page book “The Rapture Plot,” I invite you to read my many internet articles including “Famous Rapture Watchers,” “Pretrib Rapture Diehards,” “Humbug Huebner,” “Thomas Ice (Bloopers)” and “Thomas Ice – Hired Gun,” “X-Raying Margaret,” “Deceiving and Being Deceived,” “The Unoriginal John Darby,” “Pretrib Rapture – Hidden Facts” and “Pretrib Rapture Dishonesty.”

  2. Pingback: Isaiah 13-23 An Introduction to the Oracles of Isaiah. « Historicist Blog

  3. Pingback: The Messianic movement and Dispensationalism. « Historicist Blog

  4. Pingback: Isaiah 20 Sargon II conquered Egypt « Historicist Blog

  5. Pingback: Demons Run « Historicist Blog

  6. Pingback: The Rape of Tamar, 2 Samuel 13 « His Banner over Me is Love

  7. Pingback: Matt. 13:24 -30 The Wheat and the Tares « Historicist Blog

  8. Pingback: Hosea 12 « His Banner over Me is Love

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 33 other followers